<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments for Law Jock</title> <atom:link href="http://www.lawjock.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.lawjock.com</link> <description>&#34;Agile Legal Advice for a Competitive World&#34;</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Comment on Soliciting an End to the Ban on General Solicitations by Joe Stansell</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2012/01/soliciting-and-end-to-the-ban-on-general-solicitations/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link> <dc:creator>Joe Stansell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/?p=306#comment-12</guid> <description>This is a test comment. It has no purpose other than to test code.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a test comment. It has no purpose other than to test code.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Section 83(b) Smarts by Section 83(b) Mechanics</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2011/04/section-83b-smarts/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link> <dc:creator>Section 83(b) Mechanics</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:02:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/?p=222#comment-11</guid> <description>[...] 5, 2012 &#183; Leave a Comment &#183; In Emerging Company Law  This article is a follow-up to a previous one that introduced Section 83(b), a provision of the Internal Revenue Code that rescues individuals [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5, 2012 &middot; Leave a Comment &middot; In Emerging Company Law  This article is a follow-up to a previous one that introduced Section 83(b), a provision of the Internal Revenue Code that rescues individuals [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on FTC and privacy on the net &#8230; by Tweets that mention FTC and Net Privacy ... &#124; Law Jock -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2010/12/privacy-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention FTC and Net Privacy ... &#124; Law Jock -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:30:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/?p=124#comment-9</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Hansford, Joe Stansell. Joe Stansell said: Published a new post: FTC and privacy on the net ... http://bit.ly/eOE7T8 #consumer_privacy #FTC [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Hansford, Joe Stansell. Joe Stansell said: Published a new post: FTC and privacy on the net &#8230; <a
href="http://bit.ly/eOE7T8" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/eOE7T8</a> #consumer_privacy #FTC [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on RFOD &#124; Infringement of intellectual property … by Tweets that mention Investment risk factor -- infringing intellectual property &#124; Law Jock -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2010/11/rfod-infringement-of-intellectual-property/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention Investment risk factor -- infringing intellectual property &#124; Law Jock -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:43:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/?p=110#comment-8</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brendan O&#039;Brien, Joe Stansell. Joe Stansell said: Published a new post: RFOD &#124; Infringement of intellectual http://bit.ly/dXEjHD #intellectual_property_infringement #investment_risk_factor [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brendan O&#039;Brien, Joe Stansell. Joe Stansell said: Published a new post: RFOD | Infringement of intellectual <a
href="http://bit.ly/dXEjHD" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dXEjHD</a> #intellectual_property_infringement #investment_risk_factor [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Goldman Sachs &#8211; Snake Oiler? by Tweets that mention Goldman Sachs – Snake Oiler? &#124; Chalk Talk -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2010/04/goldman-sachs-snake-oiler/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention Goldman Sachs – Snake Oiler? &#124; Chalk Talk -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:24:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/chalktalk/?p=43#comment-6</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joe Stansell. Joe Stansell said: Published a new post: Goldman Sachs - Snake Oiler? @http://tinyurl.com/y2589g6 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joe Stansell. Joe Stansell said: Published a new post: Goldman Sachs &#8211; Snake Oiler? @http://tinyurl.com/y2589g6 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Venture Capital Threatened? by Joe Stansell</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2010/03/venture-capital-threatened/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link> <dc:creator>Joe Stansell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:00:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/chalktalk/?p=37#comment-7</guid> <description>Also worthy of a quick read on the same point about coming structural changes in the VC community:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidblerner.com/david_b_lerner/2010/03/the-future-of-venture-capital-is-hanging-out-downtown-the-not-so-big-secret.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.davidblerner.com/david_b_lerner/2010...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also worthy of a quick read on the same point about coming structural changes in the VC community: <a
href="http://www.davidblerner.com/david_b_lerner/2010/03/the-future-of-venture-capital-is-hanging-out-downtown-the-not-so-big-secret.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidblerner.com/david_b_lerner/2010&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Angels bedeviled? by Venture Capital Threatened? &#124; Chalk Talk</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2010/03/angels-bedeviled/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link> <dc:creator>Venture Capital Threatened? &#124; Chalk Talk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/chalktalk/?p=29#comment-5</guid> <description>[...] future availability of venture capital may be dimming somewhat.  First, as I wrote in my last post, Congress is considering potential legislation that will almost undoubtedly reduce the pool of [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] future availability of venture capital may be dimming somewhat.  First, as I wrote in my last post, Congress is considering potential legislation that will almost undoubtedly reduce the pool of [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Venture Capital Threatened? by Joe Stansell</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2010/03/venture-capital-threatened/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link> <dc:creator>Joe Stansell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:00:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/chalktalk/?p=37#comment-4</guid> <description>Also worthy of a quick read on the same point about coming structural changes in the VC community:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidblerner.com/david_b_lerner/2010/03/the-future-of-venture-capital-is-hanging-out-downtown-the-not-so-big-secret.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.davidblerner.com/david_b_lerner/2010...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also worthy of a quick read on the same point about coming structural changes in the VC community: <a
href="http://www.davidblerner.com/david_b_lerner/2010/03/the-future-of-venture-capital-is-hanging-out-downtown-the-not-so-big-secret.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidblerner.com/david_b_lerner/2010&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Angels bedeviled? by Joe Stansell</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2010/03/angels-bedeviled/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link> <dc:creator>Joe Stansell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:44:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/chalktalk/?p=29#comment-3</guid> <description>More fodder, this from Dan Rosen, Chair of Seattle&#039;s Alliance of Angels: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.drosenassoc.com/?p=23&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.drosenassoc.com/?p=23&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More fodder, this from Dan Rosen, Chair of Seattle&#39;s Alliance of Angels: <a
href="http://blog.drosenassoc.com/?p=23" rel="nofollow">http://blog.drosenassoc.com/?p=23</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Do as I say, not as I do by Joe Stansell</title><link>http://www.lawjock.com/2010/03/do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link> <dc:creator>Joe Stansell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:45:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawjock.com/chalktalk/?p=19#comment-2</guid> <description>I&#039;m working on blog admin and this is a test post.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working on blog admin and this is a test post.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!--
Hyper cache file: c41aeb32f6af9276e873d83c73a9b354
Cache created: 23-02-2012 05:05:27
HCE Version: 0.9.8
Load AVG: 7.68(20)
-->
